Full Court Press: 4/25/05 Celtics vs. Pacers Game 2
By Jon Duke
Pacers 82 - Celtics 79
The Boston Celtics were 3 minutes away from being ahead in their Best-of-seven series from the Indiana Pacers when they suddenly forgot how to run an offense. Up 76-70 with just under 3 minutes to go, the Celtics ran a lobotomized offense that produced an unimaginable number of bad shots and gave the Pacers ample opportunity to move ahead. From that point, Indiana finished the game on a 12-3 run, and sent their first round series back to Conseco Fieldhouse tied at one game apiece.
Early on the Pacers simply could not miss. The performances Stephen Jackson and Reggie Miller put on in the first quarter gave this Celtics fan flashbacks of the Chuck Person - Reggie Miller years in the early 90’s. Jackson had only 3 points fewer than his points per game average (18 ppg) in the opening stanza, and Miller did something that he was unable to do at anytime on Saturday, make a 3 pointer. Despite the Pacers blitz, the Celtics hung tough and stayed close with an astounding 9 first quarter offensive rebounds. At quarter’s end, the Celtics only trailed 30-22.
As both teams entered last night’s game, most eyes were fixed on the Celtics bench, attempting to see if Jefferson, Davis, Banks, and company could duplicate their dominant effort from Saturday. While the Celtics second unit was not as explosive on the offensive end as in Game 1, their defense keyed a Celtics comeback and pushed the C’s into the lead when the starters began to re-enter the game. Unfortunately, the Celtics starters were not able to carryover the second unit’s defensive intensity and finished the 2nd quarter down 47-42.
The “punch-counterpunch” theme continued into the second half, as the game came to resemble a middleweight title match, with each team trading blows throughout. In the third quarter, Paul Pierce took over and played a stretch of basketball that was as good as I have seen from the Celtics captain. Pierce not only hit a number of tough shots over a 15-minute period, but his defense, passing, and rebounding was top notch. Pierce had his game going in such a manner that I felt there was no way the Celtics could lose this game because Pierce was unstoppable. That is until the latter stages of the 4th quarter.
Throughout last night’s game the Celtics’ contributing players struggled, most notably Ricky Davis, Raef LaFrentz, and Gary Payton. The three combined for 13 points last night, which Davis had on his own in Game 1. The “Bad 3″ also totaled 9 turnovers, 5 of which were credited to Davis, and while the Celtics were able to overcome the poor performances by these contributors early on, it caught up with them at crunch time. Without a significant contribution from Davis, LaFrentz, or Payton; the Celtics reverted to what Antoine calls “The Grind” or the most unattractive, Iso-laden offensive game the world has ever created. Thankfully, Antoine did not revert to his free shooting old ways, but the ball became far too stationary in Pierce’s hands. It has almost come to the point that Celtics fans are frightened to see Pierce get hot for fear that last evening’s crunch time collapse would appear. Unfortunately, even after 83 meaningful games in Doc Rivers’s offense, the Boston Celtics have not learned that the easiest offense to stop is a stationary offense. No doubt, the Pacers defense was great for the first three quarters, but their lack of depth caught up with them in the 4th quarter. The only thing that saved the Pacers was the Celtics inability to execute their offense, and a pair of defensive lapses once Indiana replaced 7-foot Scot Pollard with 6-6 James Jones in an effort to spread the floor with shooters. For whatever reason, Doc did not immediately respond by replacing LaFrentz with Tony Allen, and it ultimately cost the C’s with a pair of big baskets to even the game at 76.
Following the Pacers’ performance in Game 1, there was some question if the Pacers squad that finished strong down the stretch would show up in Game 2, and they did. Entering Game 3, the focus shifts to the Celtics. In my mind, there is no doubt that Ricky Davis will respond with a much stronger performance, and LaFrentz and Payton should rebound with production somewhere between the highs of Game 1 and lows of Game 2. The unknown revolves around the second unit, and what production Doc can rely on from Al Jefferson and Marcus Banks. Jefferson struggled on the offensive end in Game 2 due to some key defensive tweaks from Rick Carlisle that didn’t allow Jefferson to know precisely where his double team would come from. Ricky Davis’s struggles from the field contributed to Wheezie’s lack of production, but Doc will need to find new ways of getting the ball to Jefferson where he can be successful. Banks is much more of an enigma, and Carlisle found some ways to protect Anthony Johnson from Banks’s suffocating defense. If Doc cannot find a new way to pressure Johnson with Banks, then he must determine whether Banks or West can best push the tempo and run the half court set. Whoever does, deserves the bulk of playing time in Game 3. Delonte West played well in limited minutes in Game 2, after a solid playoff debut in Game 1. Despite finishing without any points, West was active all over the court and pounded the glass with his 6-3 frame.
One will learn a lot about this Celtics team Thursday night when they face off against the Pacers in Indianapolis. As Tommy Heinsohn related last night, the Celtics didn’t play anywhere near as well as they can play while the Pacers were close to their apex. Despite the crunch time struggles, a Celtics fan should walk away from Game 2 believing that this series should ultimately end with the Celtics moving on to the second round.